A. True Ott PhD presented another brilliant TSBTS show today, in follow-up to his posting part ten of the ongoing series of papers entitled Righteous Blood (links to all parts below). At the end he describes the Samson complex: a suicidal mission of taking out more of one's enemy as they themselves perish in the gesture of aggression - such as the Edomite-controlled state of Israel is about to perform by attacking Iran.
Y'all are gonna wanna take today's program in. And if you have NOT read all ten parts of the paper below, please do so before jumping to any ill-conceived conclusions of "anti-semitism" or "white supremacy" - that's just utter nonsense.
Righteous Blood Part I
Righteous Blood Part II
Righteous Blood Part III
Righteous Blood Part IV
Righteous Blood Part V
Righteous Blood Part VI – (Attention Christians – SAY HELL-o To Khazar Ray Kurzweil)
Righteous Blood Part VII: The Seeds of Civil War Bloom into WORLD WARS!
Righteous Blood Part VIII – UNCLE SAMAEL WANTS YOU!!!!
Righteous Blood Part VIII – CONTINUED – the “Other Four” Of the “Top Six”
Righteous Blood Part IX – “Transcendent Mammon”
Righteous Blood Part X: Mordecai Vanunu – The “Little Big Man” Hero of Edomite “Israel”.
Is Obama a CIA Controlled Manchurian President?
Heavy Chemtrails – CA, NW US, and Mexico
Blueprint on global plan for TB vaccine unveiled
The Predatory State of California, Part 2
Greece is Now Irrelevant. Watch Spain and Germany
Greg’s March 17 2012 Radio Show
Finally! Our country is being put back on track!
3/20/2012 — ALERT ! Mexico 7.9M earthquake PRE-PLANNED = verified simulation for march 20, 2012
Obama Executive Order: The Takeover of Municipalities Drowning in Debt!
Armageddon's Alliance
Five Minutes To Self-Immolation Of The Israeli Empire
US War Game clearly foreshadows Israeli attack on Iran
Attacking Iran to have disastrous consequence says Russian Foreign Minister
The "Hunger Games" - Satanic Ritual for Teens
STATEMENT FROM DR BOB SEARS RE: CALIFORNIA ASSEMBLY BILL
California Bill AB2109 Threatens Vaccine Freedom of Choice
The California Legislature is currently considering a bill that would require parents to obtain their doctor’s signature on a government form prior to enrollment in public school if they wish to skip one or more vaccines for their child. Current law allows parents to decline vaccines by signing an exemption form at the school – no doctor’s signature needed. The new law would require “a written statement signed by a health care practitioner that indicates that the practitioner provided the parent with information regarding the benefits and risks of the immunization and the health risks of specified communicable diseases.”
On the surface, this doesn’t seem like a bad idea. It will require parents to prove that they’ve had an informed discussion with their physician. Most parents already have such discussions anyway. However, what gravely concerns me is that some doctors will refuse to sign this form. I know how doctors think. Many doctors strongly believe that vaccines should be mandatory, and that parents should not have the right to decline vaccines. Some doctors are willing to provide care to unvaccinated kids, despite this difference in philosophy. But now the power over this decision will be put directly into doctors’ hands. He or she can simply refuse to sign the form. Doctors who oppose vaccine freedom of choice have been frustrated for years over this issue. Finally, they will have the power to impose their beliefs on their patients. Patients will be forced to find another doctor to sign the form, submit to vaccines, or get kicked out of public school.
Supporters of this bill believe that all doctors will be willing to sign this form, as the signature does not imply agreement with the parent’s decision; it simply signifies that the doctor has provided the parents with information regarding the pros and cons. I disagree. I know for an absolute fact that some doctors will not sign this form out of principle or over fears of liability.
Parents will be forced to “doctor shop” for another doctor to sign their form. This won’t be easy. Some doctors are reluctant to take new patients who don’t vaccinate. Many doctors will be unwilling to sign an exemption form for a new patient or a patient who is only there for one visit (just to get the form signed). Some doctors get financial incentives from insurance companies for having high vaccination rates into their practice; seeing patients to get their form signed will put such bonuses at risk. How many doctors will parents be expected to call? How many “no’s” will a patient need in order to be allowed into school? Natural and alternative health care providers can NOT sign the form; it must be a “regular” medical professional. Some families only see naturopathic or holistic health care practitioners instead of pediatricians. These families will have a difficult time getting the form signed.
And what will happen to those kids who can’t get their formed signed? They will be denied entry into public school.
The sponsors of this bill may have some good intentions, as their primary “public” reason for the bill is to make sure that parents who don’t vaccinate their children are making an informed medical decision under the guidance of their doctor. But it isn’t difficult to see the REAL reason for the bill: to increase vaccination rates in our state by making it more difficult for parents to claim the exemption. But whatever the reason, this bill will likely NOT increase vaccination rates, nor will it create closer partnerships between doctors and patients. It will create anger, financial hardship, animosity, and further mistrust in our medical system.
For those patients who CAN find a doctor to sign their form, these “doctor-patient lectures” are not going to increase vaccination rates: Parents who are seeking a doctor’s signature have already made up their mind. The doctor isn’t going to change it during a ten minute discussion. The time for a doctor to influence parents’ opinion and trust of vaccines is during the initial well-baby checkups, years before such exemption forms even come into play. By the time a child will enter school, the parents have made up their mind to decline vaccines. A lecture from a doctor at this point won’t matter. It’s a waste of everyone’s time and money. At a time when we are trying to decrease health care spending, this bill will add millions of dollars of extra health care visits for families every year. If this unfortunate bill passes in California, the rest of the country will be soon to follow.
And it’s a government intrusion into our personal freedom to make health care decisions for our children.
There are numerous other objections to this bill:
It will cost the parents, or their insurance company, more money for the extra appointments. This could cost our state millions of dollars in extra health care costs every year. We are trying to DECREASE health care spending, not increase it.
This bill may seem like it is designed to create a closer partnership between physician and patients. Instead, it will create more animosity between parents, doctors, and schools, amid a climate of vaccine controversy that is already volatile.
Be aware that the legislators who are sponsoring this bill have received campaign donations from vaccine manufacturers.
Enrollment in public schools may decrease, which will in turn decrease public school funding.
SO WHAT CAN YOU DO?
Call your California Senator and Assemblyperson now and share your opinion. Here’s an easy way. Go to http://nvicadvocacy.org/members/Resources/CAOPPOSEAB2109RestrictingVaccineExemptions.aspx and you will see a summary of the bill, numerous arguments against it, and see contact information for the members of the Assembly Committee on Health who are involved in this bill. You can also register to become a member. It’s free! – see step two below the list of the assemblypersons, or click on this link: http://nvicadvocacy.org/members/Home.aspx. After you register, you can click on AB2109 under the Action Needed Now section. You will be given your California Senator and Assemblyperson’s contact information based on your zip code. You can then call or EMAIL to express your opinion. Thank you for joining me and many others to guard our freedom.
Dr. Bob Sears
Author of The Vaccine Book
TACA Physician Advisory Group
Y'all are gonna wanna take today's program in. And if you have NOT read all ten parts of the paper below, please do so before jumping to any ill-conceived conclusions of "anti-semitism" or "white supremacy" - that's just utter nonsense.
Righteous Blood Part I
Righteous Blood Part II
Righteous Blood Part III
Righteous Blood Part IV
Righteous Blood Part V
Righteous Blood Part VI – (Attention Christians – SAY HELL-o To Khazar Ray Kurzweil)
Righteous Blood Part VII: The Seeds of Civil War Bloom into WORLD WARS!
Righteous Blood Part VIII – UNCLE SAMAEL WANTS YOU!!!!
Righteous Blood Part VIII – CONTINUED – the “Other Four” Of the “Top Six”
Righteous Blood Part IX – “Transcendent Mammon”
Righteous Blood Part X: Mordecai Vanunu – The “Little Big Man” Hero of Edomite “Israel”.
Is Obama a CIA Controlled Manchurian President?
Heavy Chemtrails – CA, NW US, and Mexico
Blueprint on global plan for TB vaccine unveiled
The Predatory State of California, Part 2
Greece is Now Irrelevant. Watch Spain and Germany
Greg’s March 17 2012 Radio Show
Finally! Our country is being put back on track!
3/20/2012 — ALERT ! Mexico 7.9M earthquake PRE-PLANNED = verified simulation for march 20, 2012
Obama Executive Order: The Takeover of Municipalities Drowning in Debt!
Armageddon's Alliance
Five Minutes To Self-Immolation Of The Israeli Empire
US War Game clearly foreshadows Israeli attack on Iran
Attacking Iran to have disastrous consequence says Russian Foreign Minister
The "Hunger Games" - Satanic Ritual for Teens
- Gov’t samples “suspicious black dust” — Will test for plutonium — Taken from places already ‘decontaminated’ — Official: Prepare for ‘undetectable’ results, “I believe it will be more or less adjusted to what the authorities will be OK with”
- Kyodo: Fukushima Daiichi “long way from being out of the woods” — No one knows where melted nuclear fuel is located — Still great uncertainty over the complex’s status
- Official at Meeting: “We recognize that there are black materials everywhere in the city” of Minamisoma
- Tepco: Fire breaks out at Fukushima Daiichi — Happened while working on fire protection equipment
- Listen: Serious long term concern as Fukushima’s “bizarre” melted fuel interacts with environment — Release of radionuclides now poses much longer threat compared to initial meltdowns — “We know very little” says lead author (AUDIO & VIDEO)
- Mass arrests at nuclear protest in India — “Immediate steps” being taken to start reactors
- Kyodo: Woman dies in Fukushima evacuation zone — Suddenly fell ill and collapsed
- Gundersen: 20 percent of young girls living in some areas around Fukushima Daiichi will get cancer from radiation over their lifetimes (AUDIO)
STATEMENT FROM DR BOB SEARS RE: CALIFORNIA ASSEMBLY BILL
California Bill AB2109 Threatens Vaccine Freedom of Choice
The California Legislature is currently considering a bill that would require parents to obtain their doctor’s signature on a government form prior to enrollment in public school if they wish to skip one or more vaccines for their child. Current law allows parents to decline vaccines by signing an exemption form at the school – no doctor’s signature needed. The new law would require “a written statement signed by a health care practitioner that indicates that the practitioner provided the parent with information regarding the benefits and risks of the immunization and the health risks of specified communicable diseases.”
On the surface, this doesn’t seem like a bad idea. It will require parents to prove that they’ve had an informed discussion with their physician. Most parents already have such discussions anyway. However, what gravely concerns me is that some doctors will refuse to sign this form. I know how doctors think. Many doctors strongly believe that vaccines should be mandatory, and that parents should not have the right to decline vaccines. Some doctors are willing to provide care to unvaccinated kids, despite this difference in philosophy. But now the power over this decision will be put directly into doctors’ hands. He or she can simply refuse to sign the form. Doctors who oppose vaccine freedom of choice have been frustrated for years over this issue. Finally, they will have the power to impose their beliefs on their patients. Patients will be forced to find another doctor to sign the form, submit to vaccines, or get kicked out of public school.
Supporters of this bill believe that all doctors will be willing to sign this form, as the signature does not imply agreement with the parent’s decision; it simply signifies that the doctor has provided the parents with information regarding the pros and cons. I disagree. I know for an absolute fact that some doctors will not sign this form out of principle or over fears of liability.
Parents will be forced to “doctor shop” for another doctor to sign their form. This won’t be easy. Some doctors are reluctant to take new patients who don’t vaccinate. Many doctors will be unwilling to sign an exemption form for a new patient or a patient who is only there for one visit (just to get the form signed). Some doctors get financial incentives from insurance companies for having high vaccination rates into their practice; seeing patients to get their form signed will put such bonuses at risk. How many doctors will parents be expected to call? How many “no’s” will a patient need in order to be allowed into school? Natural and alternative health care providers can NOT sign the form; it must be a “regular” medical professional. Some families only see naturopathic or holistic health care practitioners instead of pediatricians. These families will have a difficult time getting the form signed.
And what will happen to those kids who can’t get their formed signed? They will be denied entry into public school.
The sponsors of this bill may have some good intentions, as their primary “public” reason for the bill is to make sure that parents who don’t vaccinate their children are making an informed medical decision under the guidance of their doctor. But it isn’t difficult to see the REAL reason for the bill: to increase vaccination rates in our state by making it more difficult for parents to claim the exemption. But whatever the reason, this bill will likely NOT increase vaccination rates, nor will it create closer partnerships between doctors and patients. It will create anger, financial hardship, animosity, and further mistrust in our medical system.
For those patients who CAN find a doctor to sign their form, these “doctor-patient lectures” are not going to increase vaccination rates: Parents who are seeking a doctor’s signature have already made up their mind. The doctor isn’t going to change it during a ten minute discussion. The time for a doctor to influence parents’ opinion and trust of vaccines is during the initial well-baby checkups, years before such exemption forms even come into play. By the time a child will enter school, the parents have made up their mind to decline vaccines. A lecture from a doctor at this point won’t matter. It’s a waste of everyone’s time and money. At a time when we are trying to decrease health care spending, this bill will add millions of dollars of extra health care visits for families every year. If this unfortunate bill passes in California, the rest of the country will be soon to follow.
And it’s a government intrusion into our personal freedom to make health care decisions for our children.
There are numerous other objections to this bill:
It will cost the parents, or their insurance company, more money for the extra appointments. This could cost our state millions of dollars in extra health care costs every year. We are trying to DECREASE health care spending, not increase it.
This bill may seem like it is designed to create a closer partnership between physician and patients. Instead, it will create more animosity between parents, doctors, and schools, amid a climate of vaccine controversy that is already volatile.
Be aware that the legislators who are sponsoring this bill have received campaign donations from vaccine manufacturers.
Enrollment in public schools may decrease, which will in turn decrease public school funding.
SO WHAT CAN YOU DO?
Call your California Senator and Assemblyperson now and share your opinion. Here’s an easy way. Go to http://nvicadvocacy.org/members/Resources/CAOPPOSEAB2109RestrictingVaccineExemptions.aspx and you will see a summary of the bill, numerous arguments against it, and see contact information for the members of the Assembly Committee on Health who are involved in this bill. You can also register to become a member. It’s free! – see step two below the list of the assemblypersons, or click on this link: http://nvicadvocacy.org/members/Home.aspx. After you register, you can click on AB2109 under the Action Needed Now section. You will be given your California Senator and Assemblyperson’s contact information based on your zip code. You can then call or EMAIL to express your opinion. Thank you for joining me and many others to guard our freedom.
Dr. Bob Sears
Author of The Vaccine Book
TACA Physician Advisory Group
No comments:
Post a Comment